Just lately MindYourDecisions reached the unbelievable milestone of three.14 million subscribers. I’m grateful on your assist, and in honor of passing pi million subscribers, I wished to share one among my favourite details about π.
Begin by writing the primary three odd numbers twice.
1 1 3 3 5 5
Cut up the numbers down the center to kind two totally different three digit numbers.
113 and 355
Take the bigger quantity and divide it by the smaller quantity
355/113
This fraction, is the same as 3.141592, which is correct to six decimal locations of π, inside 0.000009% of its true worth!
However who found this unbelievable approximation for π?
The thriller of 355/113 and pi
Or preserve studying.
.
.
“All might be effectively should you use your thoughts on your selections, and thoughts solely your selections.” Since 2007, I’ve devoted my life to sharing the enjoyment of sport idea and arithmetic. MindYourDecisions now has over 1,000 free articles with no advertisements due to group assist! Assist out and get early entry to posts with a pledge on Patreon.
.
.
.
.
.
.
M
I
N
D
.
Y
O
U
R
.
D
E
C
I
S
I
O
N
S
.
P
I
.
.
.
.
Who Found Pi Is Practically Equal To 355/113
(Just about all posts are transcribed rapidly after I make the movies for them–please let me know if there are any typos/errors and I’ll appropriate them, thanks).
In 2010, the mathematician David Bau contemplated on the thriller of 355/113, trying to find the fraction in a number of well-known formulation, nevertheless it was nowhere to be discovered. Bau wrote,
“So, then, the place does 355/113 come from? Is its nearness to pi a mere coincidence? A mathematical accident? A freak of nature?”
Like Bau, I used to be stumped. Nevertheless it does have a really outstanding historical past relationship again to historic occasions.
The fraction 355/113 was found by Zu Chongzhi round 480 CE, who constructed upon the work of Lui Hui and He Chengtian.
The thought of pi
Most of us be taught that the Greek mathematician Archimedes developed one of many earliest correct approximations of π. The ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter is π, so a circle with a diameter of 1 has a circumference equal to π.
Archimedes constructed inscribed and circumscribed common hexagons whose perimeters might be calculated. The circle’s circumference can be squeezed between these values. He then doubled the perimeters to 12, 24, 48, and at last 96-sides to estimate π between 223/71 and 22/7, the latter being probably the most helpful approximation of about 3.14.
The following main improvement in pi’s computation occurred in China round 500 years later. Fully separate from the Greek custom, Liu Hui invented an ingenious algorithm primarily based on the areas of inscribed polygons. Contemplate a circle with a radius of 1, so its space is the same as π. Inscribe a daily polygon with n sides (on this case a 6 sided hexagon) with space An and likewise inscribe a daily polygon of twon sides (on this case a 12-sided dodecagon), with space A2n.
Let D2n be the distinction in areas. He seen he may duplicate the distinction exterior, which might create bounding rectangles on every triangle. This is able to clearly overestimate the circle’s space. So the then deduced:
A2n < π < A2n + D2n
Liu Hui calculated as much as a 96-gon and located π was roughly 3.1416.
A pair hundred years later, Zu Chongzhi used the strategy with an astounding 12,288-gon to calculate calculating π as between 3.1415926 and three.1415927. This document accuracy of seven decimal locations was not surpassed for over 900 years till Madhava devised the infinite sequence for π to calculate to to 10 decimal locations.
However returning to the unique matter, we nonetheless have a thriller, how did they discover the fraction 355/113?
Mediant
He Chengtian developed a way of fraction interpolation known as “harmonization of the divisor of the day.” It begins with an attention-grabbing little truth
a/b < c/d for fractions in lowest kind
then
a/b < (a + c)/(b + d) < c/d
You may take into consideration the end result when it comes to statistical averages. Take into consideration scoring a factors in b video games, for a median of a/b, after which scoring c factors in d video games, for a median of c/d. Your total common might be your complete factors a + c divided by your complete video games b + d. However the total common (a + c)/(b + d) is the weighted common of your individial averages, so it have to be between these averages of a/b and c/d.
The inequality will also be illustrated with vectors. The slope of the center vector is between the slopes of the opposite vectors.
He Chengtian used this inequality for fraction interpolation. Let’s say now we have some identified quantity x that’s between two fractions a/b and c/d.
a/b < x < c/d
We are able to scale back the interval dimension by calculating the mediant which can all the time be within the center. If the mediant is bigger than x, we take it as the brand new higher certain. If the mediant is smaller than x, we take it as the brand new decrease certain.
Suppose the mediant is bigger than x so now we have:
a/b < x < (a + c)/(b + d)
We are able to then take the brand new higher certain as a fraction c‘/d‘ and iterate the algorithm once more by calculating the brand new mediant.
On this method we are able to preserve discovering nearer and nearer fractions to x.
Discovering 355/113
We’re taking x = π, however since π is irrational we have to begin with some approximation. Zu Chongzhi took x = 3.1416. Clearly that is between 3/1 and 4/1, so we are able to begin:
3/1 < 3.1416 < 4/1
We now calculate the mediant (3 + 4)/(1 + 1) = 7/2 = 3.5. That is bigger than 3.1416 so that is the brand new higher certain.
3/1 < 3.1416 < 7/2
The brand new mediant is (3 + 7)/(1 + 2) = 10/3 = 3.33 which can once more show to be a brand new higher certain.
3/1 < 3.1416 < 10/3
The method is repeated time and again, with decrease and higher bounds of:
3/1 and 4/1
3/1 and seven/2
3/1 and 10/3
3/1 and 13/4
3/1 and 16/5
3/1 and 19/6
3/1 and 22/7
The following mediant is (3 + 22)/(1 + 7) = 25/8 = 3.125 and this worth is lower than 3.1416, so this turns into the brand new decrease certain. In reality all of the remaining iterations are altering the decrease bounds.
25/8 and 22/7
47/15 and 22/7
69/22 and 22/7
91/29 and 22/7
113/36 and 22/7
135/43 and 22/7
157/50 and 22/7
179/57 and 22/7
201/64 and 22/7
223/71 and 22/7
245/78 and 22/7
267/85 and 22/7
289/92 and 22/7
311/99 and 22/7
333/106 and 22/7
355/113 and 22/7
On this closing line now we have discovered 3.1416 is between 355/113 and 22/7. And that is the place now we have the fraction 355/113 is roughly equal to π!
(Notice this algorithm was primarily based on an approximate worth 3.1416 for π, and we obtained 355/113 < 3.1416 < 22/7. However in actuality 355/113 is definitely bigger than π, and now we have π < 355/113 < 22/7).
It’s actually a outstanding historical past that I’m glad to share!
References
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Liu_hui.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E7percentA5percent96percentE5percent86percentB2percentE4percentB9percent8BpercentE9percent93percent9CpercentE5percent83percent8F.jpg
Story of pi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tB0zjT75yto
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_calculus
Milü
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MilpercentC3percentBC
Chronology of computation of π
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_computation_of_percentCFpercent80
Liu Hui’s π algorithm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liu_Huipercent27s_percentCFpercent80_algorithm
Pi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi
Thriller of 355 over 113
https://net.archive.org/net/20100322225540/https://davidbau.com/archives/2010/03/14/the_mystery_of_355113.html
https://information.ycombinator.com/merchandise?id=4285531
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zu_Chongzhi
mediant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediant_(arithmetic)
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1989104/mediant-inequality-proof-fracab-fracacbd-fraccd
MY BOOKS
If you buy by these hyperlinks, I could also be compensated for purchases made on Amazon. As an Amazon Affiliate I earn from qualifying purchases. This doesn’t have an effect on the value you pay.
Guide scores are from January 2025.
(US and worldwide hyperlinks)
https://mindyourdecisions.com/weblog/my-books
Thoughts Your Choices is a compilation of 5 books:
(1) The Pleasure of Recreation Idea: An Introduction to Strategic Pondering
(2) 40 Paradoxes in Logic, Likelihood, and Recreation Idea
(3) The Irrationality Phantasm: How To Make Good Choices And Overcome Bias
(4) The Greatest Psychological Math Methods
(5) Multiply Numbers By Drawing Strains
The Pleasure of Recreation Idea reveals how you need to use math to out-think your competitors. (rated 4.2/5 stars on 564 critiques)
40 Paradoxes in Logic, Likelihood, and Recreation Idea comprises thought-provoking and counter-intuitive outcomes. (rated 4.2/5 stars on 81 critiques)
The Irrationality Phantasm: How To Make Good Choices And Overcome Bias is a handbook that explains the various methods we’re biased about decision-making and affords methods to make good selections. (rated 4.2/5 stars on 55 critiques)
The Greatest Psychological Math Methods teaches how one can seem like a math genius by fixing issues in your head (rated 4.3/5 stars on 148 critiques)
Multiply Numbers By Drawing Strains This e-book is a reference information for my video that has over 1 million views on a geometrical methodology to multiply numbers. (rated 4.5/5 stars on 57 critiques)
Thoughts Your Puzzles is a group of the three “Math Puzzles” books, volumes 1, 2, and three. The puzzles matters embrace the mathematical topics together with geometry, likelihood, logic, and sport idea.
Math Puzzles Quantity 1 options traditional mind teasers and riddles with full options for issues in counting, geometry, likelihood, and sport idea. Quantity 1 is rated 4.4/5 stars on 138 critiques.
Math Puzzles Quantity 2 is a sequel e-book with extra nice issues. (rated 4.2/5 stars on 45 critiques)
Math Puzzles Quantity 3 is the third within the sequence. (rated 4.3/5 stars on 38 critiques)
KINDLE UNLIMITED
Academics and college students around the globe typically e mail me in regards to the books. Since training can have such a huge effect, I attempt to make the ebooks out there as extensively as attainable at as low a value as attainable.
Presently you’ll be able to learn most of my ebooks by Amazon’s “Kindle Limitless” program. Included within the subscription you’re going to get entry to thousands and thousands of ebooks. You do not want a Kindle machine: you’ll be able to set up the Kindle app on any smartphone/pill/laptop/and so on. I’ve compiled hyperlinks to applications in some international locations beneath. Please verify your native Amazon web site for availability and program phrases.
US, checklist of my books (US)
UK, checklist of my books (UK)
Canada, e-book outcomes (CA)
Germany, checklist of my books (DE)
France, checklist of my books (FR)
India, checklist of my books (IN)
Australia, e-book outcomes (AU)
Italy, checklist of my books (IT)
Spain, checklist of my books (ES)
Japan, checklist of my books (JP)
Brazil, e-book outcomes (BR)
Mexico, e-book outcomes (MX)
MERCHANDISE
Seize a mug, tshirt, and extra on the official web site for merchandise: Thoughts Your Choices at Teespring.
