You open considered one of a significant. Associate raises you to 2, exhibiting assist with 6-10 excessive card factors. You’re a rebidder with an intermediate hand, 15-17 excessive card factors. Reverse a median of “eight” factors, you will have sufficient to attempt for recreation, however not sufficient to insist on it as you’ll with an 18-count.
So that you rebid three of a decrease rating swimsuit (normally a minor, however even hearts in case your swimsuit is spades) as a “assist swimsuit” attempt to see if there’s “one thing further” to propel you to recreation.
Within the model I used to be taught, a 3 degree bid in a brand new swimsuit reveals aspect swimsuit controls, sometimes a king or ace, with 3-4 playing cards within the swimsuit, and a possible for a double match and several other aspect swimsuit methods. For instance a partnership has a double match of two eight card fits and 17-18 excessive card factors. That leaves ten playing cards in two extra fits, hopefully divided 2-3 reverse 3-2, that’s, 4 losers counting ruffing values. However there shall be an ace or king left over (22 minus 18) to scale back the losers to 3.
Here is the place I’m confused. Many gamers in my membership use what I name a “brief” assist swimsuit conference. More often than not, this occurs within the context of an “implied” increase (not an precise one), corresponding to a Jacoby 2NT over considered one of a significant. Underneath these circumstances, a bid of a brand new swimsuit on the three degree reveals a singleton or void. The concept is to determine (cross) ruffing values that can enable a recreation to be made with 22-23 excessive card factors. There’s even a 3rd model in use at my membership, the place the three degree aspect swimsuit bid reveals controls: both a singleton or void, an ace, or a KQ combo.
Any system is topic to partnership settlement. However which (or all) of those programs is normally use and the way do they work? In any case, have I confused any alleged system with one thing else?
